Responding to the SCC's rejection of the Chippewas of the Thames First Nations challenge of the NEB's decision to allow the #line9 pipeline to have its flow reversed & to have the inline pressure increasedâwhile also approving for the flow of #tarsands diluted bitumen and fracked oilâdespite a complete failure to meaningfully consult any Indigenous community potentially impacted along the pipelineâs route, David-Gray Donald analysis 6 of the more absurd issues plaguing this high court decision
article: David Gray-Donald http://mediacoop.ca/story/6-glaring-issues-supreme-courts-line-9-decision/36578
Responding to the Supreme Court of Canada's rejection of the Chippewas of the Thames First Nations challenge of the National Energy Board's decision to allow the #line9 pipeline to have its flow reversed and to have the inline pressure increasedâwhile also approving for the flow of tar sands diluted bitumen and bakken-shale fracked oilâdespite a complete failure to meaningfully consult any Indigenous community potentially impacted along the pipelineâs route, David-Gray Donald analysis six of the more absurd issues plaguing this high court decision.
The bulk of this episode of AW@L radio is a reading of â6 Glaring Issues with the Supreme Court's Line 9 Decisionâ from the mediacoop.ca, posted by David Gray-Donald (@DgrDon). You can access the whole article here: http://mediacoop.ca/story/6-glaring-issues-supreme-courts-line-9-decision/36578
AW@L Radio â 2017-08-04 â 6 Glaring Issues with the Supreme Court's Line 9 Decision
![<?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/rp-navimg.gif)
![Support the <?php echo $config['site_title']; ?>](/static/images/support.png)
